Abstract:
Review Article
Epidemiology of diabetic retinopathy and maculopathy in
Africa: a systematic review
P. I. Burgess
1,2
, I. J. C. MacCormick
1,2
, S. P. Harding
2
, A. Bastawrous
3
, N. A. V. Beare
4
and P. Garner
5
1
Malawi–Liverpool–Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Programme, Queen Elizabeth Central Hospital, College of Medicine, Blantyre, Malawi,
2
Department of Eye
and Vision Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool,
3
International Centre for Eye Health, Clinical Research Department, London School of Hygiene and Tropical
Medicine, London,
4
St Pauls Eye Unit, Royal Liverpool University Teaching Hospital and
5
International Health Group, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine,
Liverpool, UK
Accepted 18 July 2012
Abstract
Aim
To summarize findings from studies reporting the prevalence
and incidence of diabetic ret
inopathy and diabetic maculopathy
in African countries in light of the ris
ing prevalence of diabetes mellitus.
Methods
Using a predefined search strategy, we systematically se
arched MEDLINE, EMBASE, S
cience Citation index and
Conference Proceedings Citation index, Af
rican Index Medicus and the grey literature
database ‘OpenSIGLE’ for studies published
between January 1990 and February 2011. Included studies reported p
revalence or incidence of diabetic retinopathy or diabetic
maculopathy of subjects with diabetes resident in African countries.
Results
Sixty-two studies from 21 countries were included: three popul
ation-based surveys; two cohort studies; five case–control
studies; 32 diabetes clinic-based, nine eye c
linic-based and 11 other hospital-based survey
s. Included studies varied considerably in
terms of patient selection, method of assessing the eye and re
tinopathy classification. In populat
ion-based studies, the reported
prevalence range in patients with diabetes for diabetic retinopat
hy was 30.2 to 31.6%, proliferati
ve diabetic retinopathy 0.9 to
1.3%, and any maculopathy 1.2 to 4.5%. In diabetes clinic-based su
rveys, the reported prevalence range for diabetic retinopathy
was 7.0 to 62.4%, proliferative diabeti
c retinopathy 0 to 6.9%, and any maculopathy
1.2 to 31.1%. No obvious association
between prevalence and income level of the country was detected.
Conclusions
Large, community-based cross-sect
ional and cohort studies are needed to i
nvestigate rates and determinants of
prevalence of diabetic retinopathy, incide
nce and progression in Africa. Consensus i
s needed on the most appropriate methods of
identification and classification of retinopathy for research and
clinical practice. Estimates of prevalence of diabetic retinopathy,
proliferative diabetic r
etinopathy and maculopathy are comparable w
ith recent European and American studies.